NLRB: Employers cannot force employees to always be cheerful


Master Driver
Posts: 2617
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Wa
Where do you work?:
Formally employed by a Papa Johns Franchise in Washington state.
User Type:
Pizza Delivery Driver
Car you drive:
One with an internal combustion engine
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 3:32 am
US employers are officially barred from requiring service workers to be happy on the job
http://qz.com/680243/us-employers-are-o ... n-the-job/


Written by
Ashley Rodriguez
May 10, 2016

Some service workers can be unpleasant to deal with, but employers can’t demand that they perk up. US labor laws protect workers’ right to be grumpy on the job.

The National Labor Review Board has ruled that employers cannot force employees to always be cheerful, as much as they might want to.

Wireless carrier T-Mobile tried to do so, through a clause in its employee handbook that required workers to “maintain a positive workplace environment.” According to the NLBR, T-Mobile’s “Workplace Conduct” guide says it:

“…expects all employees to behave in a professional manner that promotes efficiency, productivity, and cooperation. Employees are expected to maintain a positive work environment by communicating in a manner that is conducive to effective working relationships with internal and external customers, clients, co-workers, and management.”


The Communications Workers of America union, which represents T-Mobile technicians, customer-service representatives, and retail workers, thought the clause was too restrictive. Surely, employers cannot keep workers from arguing, right? They brought the issue before the NLRB and the agency agreed, in a ruling on April 29.

According to the ruling, forcing workers to be positive all the time infringes on their rights to organize. And employers cannot prevent workers from organizing.

Organizing is often spurred by controversy or unhappiness with an employer or job, the NLRB said. So workers need to be allowed to speak freely about workplace conditions, even if their statements are critical or argumentative:

“Because labor disputes and union organizing efforts frequently involve controversy, criticism of the employer, arguments, and less-than-‘positive’ statements about terms and conditions of employment, employees reading the rule here would reasonably steer clear of a range of potentially controversial but protected communication in the workplace for fear of running afoul of the rule.”


Candice Johnson, a spokesperson for the Communications Workers of America, said the ruling “benefits non-represented workers who want a union.”

The NBLR decision also included a cease-and-desist for T-Mobile end the workplace policy.

The company said it declined to comment on the ruling because litigation is pending.


I find this ruling to be hilarious, I love it!! I hope it causes some people, with certain mindsets, to have heart attacks.

The case referenced is 14-CA-106906 and the NLRB Decision can be downloaded via this link, for those that enjoy taking the time educating themselves on such things.
Don't expect others to fight your Battles
User avatar
Master Driver
Posts: 6999
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:40 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Where do you work?:
Papa John's franchise
User Type:
Pizza Delivery Driver
Car you drive:
2010 Ford Fusion
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 6:31 pm
Great article! Thanks for sharing this Elric.
"If you ain't on the road, you ain't makin' money!" - gregster

Image

Return to Union and NLRB issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron